Home | Mission | People
Grassroots | Links

Podcasts:



Powered by MovableType 3.15

Syndicate

Support the Democracy Project:



January 27, 2005

New Democrats, R.I.P.


Blogger Orrin Judd writes at TCS that the New Democratic Philosophy of Bill Clinton is dead. He notes that Social Security reform, once embraced by the likes of former Nebraska Senator Bob Kerrey, is now attacked by Democrats.

And so the restructuring that once seemed all but certain is now cast into doubt, in no small measure because what was the Democratic center has been assimilated by the Party's traditional Left. As recently as two years ago, New Democrats declared that: "We believe in reforming democracy and government to strip away top-down bureaucracy and give citizens and communities the power to solve their own problems. We must be willing to reform old programs in order to preserve our oldest values." But today they have become just another force for reaction, defenders of those same "old programs" and the very "top-down" status quo they once professed to believe in reforming.

Orrin says that George W. Bush's run as a "compassionate conservative" had a more than passing resemblance to Clinton's own "third way" policies, and the co-opting of the Democrats helps explain their current malaise. Similarly, Tony Blair has co-opted the Tories so that, like America's Democrats, they're sidelined by the determined and visionary leadership of the opposition. He says that John Howard of Australia is pursuing a "conservative version of the third way." Their common ground?

It looks as if whichever party is most closely associated with reform of the welfare state, rather than stasis, stands to reap significant and quite possibly long-term benefits at the polls.

In the face of overwhelming evidence that electoral victory is gained by moving toward the center, what have today's Democrats done? Embrace the bitter, loony left, of course, as their petulant treatment of Condoleezza Rice shows. Any party whose public face is Barbara Boxer's, or which casts itself as the reactionary wing of American politics, is sure to lose. Which is why Hillary, a true left-winger if ever there was one, is desperate to be perceived as a natural centrist. But will her compatriots notice?

Winfield Myers | Jan. 27, 2005 | 9:01 AM